The statehouse news this week has centered on the GOP House Budget and projected human service cuts that will dismantle NH’s social service infrastructure – forcing a downshift of costs to the cities and towns which will result in out of control property taxes! This all leads me to ask – Who are these People – can they really be this cold, heartless and selfish!
My mother always told me as a little boy to “not stare – it wasn’t polite”, however, for the past three months, sitting in Reps Hall – at the eastern end of section IV, [an area - I call the penalty box of political hockey] – I am constantly amazed by what comes out of their mouths and cannot help but stare and continuously ask – Who are these People and where do they come from!
Unfortunately, while much has been written about the new federal legislators – little can be found about NH House members. Being one of 400 allows for a degree of anonymity – a bad thing for the publicity seeking needy, but a valued tool for those who do not want to have their agenda exposed. Even some republicans have said they don’t know anything about these new guys. Note: I say guys because they are overwhelmingly male - this session has the lowest number of women members since something like 1974. But who are they – Are they all some sort of monolithic radical extremist political Borg – who think alike, act alike and look alike? That would be too easy.
So after three months of intensive staring – I believe they are not real republicans – they’re not even real conservatives, but radical extremists who want to deregulate everything and ultimately dismantle government.
Overall, they seem to fall into a continuum of center/center-right to extreme far right. I break them down into various sub groups: Standard Main Street Republicans (an endangered species) and the rest are tea bag types, or at least fellow travelers consisting of Home Grown Libertarians; Social Conservatives; and Free Staters.
MAIN STREET GOP:
Truly an endangered species – socially moderate, fiscally responsible, “live and let live” types are now near extinction. Sadly, should they voice disagreement with what is going on; they are immediately denounced as RINO’s (republicans in name only). I heard of a conversation with a distinguished old school republican who after talking about the need for responsible government, was denounced as ‘not really being one of us!’ FYI – once upon a time the state republican platform called for an income tax - the days of Winant, Peterson and Hager are long gone – this is not your father’s Republican Party!
TEA BAGGERS:
Now to call everyone else in the majority a member of the Tea Bag Movement would be wrong. Although many seem to identify with the tagline – they do come from different start off points.
Personally, what I really find the most offensive regarding this group is NOT their adherence to an originalist interpretation of the US & NH Constitutions. No – it is their usurpation of patriotic (historic) terms and that only their interpretation is accurate – a total intolerance for anything different. Yeah – that’s what I find especially troublesome – intolerance!
I break this collective crop of representatives into the following sub-groups – Social Conservatives, Home Grown Libertarians, and Free Staters
Social Conservatives: fewer in number than in other parts of the country, nevertheless this faith based subset is highly visible and seem willing to play ball with their more secular extremist colleagues. At first blush they appear to have cut a deal and postponed the repeal of same sex marriage. While some tout this as a victory – my concern is the issue will re-surface next year and be used to motivate their base to come out and vote in the ’12 elections, thus keep their majority.
Home Grown Libertarians: buoyed by numbers that they interpret as validation for their anti poor/anti family views – this group struts around talking in code and mumbling from the NH Constitution and starting a NH Militia. I secretly suspect that they are designing special uniforms with huge gold epaulets and lots of medals.
While some are truly sincere – many don’t seem to have too strong a link to what really is happening in the world. I suspect they are being used by others intent on turning NH into some sort of radical libertarian social science laboratory.
I include in this group a large number of Massachusetts expatriates who in many ways seem to have never fully left their home state [except for paying MA taxes.] Fiercely loud at opposing any broad based taxes – they sometimes seem to want all the creature comforts and services they left behind, especially more asphalt to Boston – they just don’t want to pay for it!
Free Staters: They appear to be driving the policy bus this session – and as such are the most dangerous and most invisible. It is not that they are quiet – it is that they (for the most part) hide their identity. Few have publically come out and stated they are Free Staters. Fortunately, they do give themselves away when it’s obvious they know nothing of NH history, geography or how to pronounce words like coos or how to correctly use ‘wicked’ in a sentence.
The Free State movement is a radical libertarian group who believe that, if they can get 20,000 like minded people to move to NH, they can take over and control local and state government. This would then provide an opportunity to dismantle government and experiment with their radical libertarian theories. Now – I know that I risk sounding like some kind of conspiracy theorist, but just look at what has been going on this session! I believe we are seeing the first wave of these interlopers who believe they know better than us – on how to run New Hampshire.
So who are they, and how do we expose them? If they were all a bunch of bomb throwing bullies we could easily tag them, however, many appear to be almost soft spoken – it’s only when they talk about guns that you see the intensity. In looking through the Blue Book it seems many suspected FS’s are educated possessing some social skills. Many also seem to be very tech savvy – maybe they have spent too much time alone before a computer screen communicating only with like minded souls. Actually this might be the crux of the problem – being affluent, and spoiled; they don’t have any knowledge about the needs of average NH families. All they care about are themselves and since they only know and talk to like minded people – they are convinced they know what’s best!
The Other ‘Real’ NH:
Allow me to compare this with a meeting I attended on Tuesday night in Claremont. A group consisting of union members, families, social service agencies and faith based groups met with our local State Senator. Basically, they were concerned about the House ideologues and what has been happening. Their hope is the NH Senate will be a counter weight and stem the tide to what they see as disaster.
Over a 100 people came out on a cold icy night to voice their fears about losing health retiree benefits, dismantling of collective bargaining, cuts in human services and weakening their ability to remain part of the middle class. Area state representatives were also invited – so we had an opportunity to hear, as well as put a face on our neighbors - the people who sent us to Concord.
Last week a long time representative stated that these proposed cuts are so bad that some people could die – hopefully it won’t come to that and the Senate and Governor will be the grownups. Let’s hope – because the People’s House is not listening!
Friday, March 25, 2011
Saturday, March 19, 2011
This Was The Week That Was - NH Style
Friday – March 18, 2011
Coming off a wild legislative week, where NH House members arrived early and left late (e.g. 10pm 3/16) – I was reminded of the old TV program by David Frost. For those too young – he would take a satirical approach at reviewing the week’s News. While certainly not as talented as Mr. Frost – I will nevertheless attempt to provide an overview of activity this past week in the NH House.
Unfortunately, there was little in the way of comedy – although in a rather dark albeit sad way, the week did have its bizarre & dark comedic moments. From a member who with the help of a sheleighly like stick kept popping up at the well (podium) like a leprechaun minus his “pot of gold” and mouthing words difficult to follow – to a surprise visit by former Speaker Newt Gingrich (the NH Primary season is upon us) – to several legislators being scolded and ordered to their seats – caused for breaks in the process of Aye’s, Nay’s, OTP’s and ITL’s…
Early in the week, a well respected senior republican senator related how he could never recall the House being in session for 3 days in a row and so late into the evening – and with a twinkle in his eye, he thanked his lucky stars that he now belongs to the other body of the NH General Court. Needless to say – with 200-300 bills to dispose of – we journeyed on to This Was The Week That Was – NH Style…
OVERVIEW:
After a quick count – it seems that we addressed a total of 272 pieces of legislation; however about 161 were passed on consent – so we only debated something like 128 in three days – nevertheless, certainly yeoman work for a citizen legislature obsessed with Jefferson’s “Agrarian Myth” and an era long gone. So here goes:
EDUCATION – NOT NH’s PROBLEM:
The NH House decided (252-113) to pass a constitutional amendment (CACR 12) that walks away from the state’s responsibility to fund education and if successful will take the Supreme Court out of the scenario. It is like the collective entity known as the State of NH does not exist, but each city & town will be left to their own devises and on their own. Of course, as nihilistic as this seems – in this present climate where everyone is out just for themselves (individualism to the max), what else should we expect but this kind of thinking to win the day.
INCOME TAX ON RETIREES:
The NH House voted to violate its promise to NH retirees regarding medical benefits. Regardless that this is payment for services rendered – the NH House voted 188–120 (HB 231-FN) to charge retirees on fixed incomes a significant amount of their modest incomes to pay for benefits. The average pension for a Group I retiree is $11,000 per year – this translates into an income tax on the elderly of NH. So much for keeping promises…
NO TO JOBS – NO TO INFRASTRUCTURE – NO TO BUSINESS:
In a 190-119 vote, the NH House decided to de-rail the NH Passenger Rail Authority. Despite the fact that this volunteer group has not cost the state a dime – and has been funded by private sector donations resulting in a 4.2 million dollar grant to study the feasibility of re-building rail service through the Merrimack River Valley from Mass thru Nashua to Manchester & Concord. The legislature said NO – NOT NEEDED. Despite a spectrum of experts who testified that it would create jobs, enhance an integrated transportation network and impact an area where 35% of the state’s population resides.
NO WORKING FAMILIES NEEDED:
The House overturned a committee recommendation relative to workforce housing that has been in effect for two years and supported by numerous communities and planning experts across the state. Workforce housing allows cities and towns creative ways to provide affordable housing for middle class families such as nurses, fire and police as well as teachers to live in the communities they work. Sadly, this legislature chose (219-110) to overturn existing law and impose obstacles for young families starting out.
GUNS & PARENTAL RIGHTS:
What do the two have in common you ask? I don’t know, but a constitutional amendment dealing with parental rights wrapped itself around the argument that the bearings of arms and parents rights were somehow connected. Regardless of the fact that both the US and NH Supreme Courts have recognized the natural rights of parents to raise their children and that the problem lies not in the constitution but in culture. Note: the constitutional amendment failed, but not before garnering 212 representatives in support.
WHO’S DA BOSS!!!
Regardless that we may be exceeding our constitutional authority, in a 259-107 vote, the House mandated the NH Attorney General to join the law suit challenging the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Now the AG has stated that he will challenge this in court as his office is part of the executive branch of state government. But these arguments didn’t carry the day – even if such a venture will be timely and costly to the taxpayer. Historically, the manner to resolve such an issue would be to solicit an Opinion of the Justices (you know that 3rd branch of government), but heck we’re the General Court and its only money we don’t have!
PISTOL PACKIN MAMA’S & PAPA’S:
This has been a strange session where it seems anything dealing with guns has priority – maybe even more important on the radical extremists’ list of priorities than dismantling government! HB 210 was relative to the use of deadly force. Now it doesn’t matter that no one has been jailed for not retreating and the issue has not been a problem, but 270-92 representatives voted to pass it anyway. Another gun bill (HB 330-FN) was relative to carrying a firearm (concealed, loaded, or unloaded) without a license. It seems that having to get a special permit to carry a concealed weapon really is too inconvenient. So in a vote of 244 – 109 the NH House voted for what they call constitutional carry. Yippee KY-yo, Welcome to Dodge!
GO TO JAIL – THROW AWAY THE KEY!
HB 524-FN dealing with persons convicted of violent crimes was passed 264 – 97, which results in critical and crippling changes to a bill passed last year. Regardless that the Attorney General, or a former republican Speaker of the House testified as to how parole is an effective tool in transitioning prisoners back into society and allows for supervision and control vs. just opening the doors and saying “see yah” when someone has completed their sentence. Even costs didn’t impact this crowd as it cost the taxpayers’ $33,000 dollars per year to house one prisoner.
NO TO VACINATIONS – NOT!
In a surprising moment of common sense – the House defeated (294-49) an attempt to prohibit vaccinations in public school (HB 422). Thankfully a house member who is a retired public health professional inoculated us against a swarm of half truths & falsehoods. I know this crowd would like to go back to a “past time” – thankfully returning to the Middle Ages and the Black Death was seen as too drastic.
DON’T BOGART THAT MED JOINT – MY FRIEND:
Another surprise was the overwhelming support (221-96) received relative to passing the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. So far it appears that marijuana and ethanol are the only issues NH can get bi-partisan agreement!
NH DEFENSE FORCE – ON HOLD (FOR NOW):
In a 175 to 137 vote the House tabled a bill establishing a state defense force. This would be a “militia” force in addition, but separate, to the NH National Guard. I guess it could be called into action to invade Canada, in light of their decision several weeks ago to condemn the Quebeckers over salmon fishing licenses. YES – 137 reps actually voted for this - maybe they saw it as a jobs bill.
SORRY CHARLIE!
The House decided to table (Committee recommendation was to pass) a piece of legislation that would have ordered our federal senators to vote against the Law of the Sea Convention – Sorry - no reprieve for Charlie the Tuna
DON’T WANT TO PAY – DON’T WORRY:
Reduce the interest rate on late and delinquent property tax payments and other unpaid taxes. Sounds great – right! If someone doesn’t pay their property tax bill when due - they now won’t have to pay a penalty. Of course each unpaid property tax bill means that the other conscientious taxpayers in the town will now have to dig deeper into their pockets to make up the difference because towns will have cash flow problems which will result in their having to borrow more to operate. But don’t worry – be happy – it sounds good. Why let reality enter into the scheme of things.
Now – I could go on (there really is more) – however it is too painful to continue – so I hope you will understand.
R. Gagnon, Representative
NH House – Sullivan District IV
Coming off a wild legislative week, where NH House members arrived early and left late (e.g. 10pm 3/16) – I was reminded of the old TV program by David Frost. For those too young – he would take a satirical approach at reviewing the week’s News. While certainly not as talented as Mr. Frost – I will nevertheless attempt to provide an overview of activity this past week in the NH House.
Unfortunately, there was little in the way of comedy – although in a rather dark albeit sad way, the week did have its bizarre & dark comedic moments. From a member who with the help of a sheleighly like stick kept popping up at the well (podium) like a leprechaun minus his “pot of gold” and mouthing words difficult to follow – to a surprise visit by former Speaker Newt Gingrich (the NH Primary season is upon us) – to several legislators being scolded and ordered to their seats – caused for breaks in the process of Aye’s, Nay’s, OTP’s and ITL’s…
Early in the week, a well respected senior republican senator related how he could never recall the House being in session for 3 days in a row and so late into the evening – and with a twinkle in his eye, he thanked his lucky stars that he now belongs to the other body of the NH General Court. Needless to say – with 200-300 bills to dispose of – we journeyed on to This Was The Week That Was – NH Style…
OVERVIEW:
After a quick count – it seems that we addressed a total of 272 pieces of legislation; however about 161 were passed on consent – so we only debated something like 128 in three days – nevertheless, certainly yeoman work for a citizen legislature obsessed with Jefferson’s “Agrarian Myth” and an era long gone. So here goes:
EDUCATION – NOT NH’s PROBLEM:
The NH House decided (252-113) to pass a constitutional amendment (CACR 12) that walks away from the state’s responsibility to fund education and if successful will take the Supreme Court out of the scenario. It is like the collective entity known as the State of NH does not exist, but each city & town will be left to their own devises and on their own. Of course, as nihilistic as this seems – in this present climate where everyone is out just for themselves (individualism to the max), what else should we expect but this kind of thinking to win the day.
INCOME TAX ON RETIREES:
The NH House voted to violate its promise to NH retirees regarding medical benefits. Regardless that this is payment for services rendered – the NH House voted 188–120 (HB 231-FN) to charge retirees on fixed incomes a significant amount of their modest incomes to pay for benefits. The average pension for a Group I retiree is $11,000 per year – this translates into an income tax on the elderly of NH. So much for keeping promises…
NO TO JOBS – NO TO INFRASTRUCTURE – NO TO BUSINESS:
In a 190-119 vote, the NH House decided to de-rail the NH Passenger Rail Authority. Despite the fact that this volunteer group has not cost the state a dime – and has been funded by private sector donations resulting in a 4.2 million dollar grant to study the feasibility of re-building rail service through the Merrimack River Valley from Mass thru Nashua to Manchester & Concord. The legislature said NO – NOT NEEDED. Despite a spectrum of experts who testified that it would create jobs, enhance an integrated transportation network and impact an area where 35% of the state’s population resides.
NO WORKING FAMILIES NEEDED:
The House overturned a committee recommendation relative to workforce housing that has been in effect for two years and supported by numerous communities and planning experts across the state. Workforce housing allows cities and towns creative ways to provide affordable housing for middle class families such as nurses, fire and police as well as teachers to live in the communities they work. Sadly, this legislature chose (219-110) to overturn existing law and impose obstacles for young families starting out.
GUNS & PARENTAL RIGHTS:
What do the two have in common you ask? I don’t know, but a constitutional amendment dealing with parental rights wrapped itself around the argument that the bearings of arms and parents rights were somehow connected. Regardless of the fact that both the US and NH Supreme Courts have recognized the natural rights of parents to raise their children and that the problem lies not in the constitution but in culture. Note: the constitutional amendment failed, but not before garnering 212 representatives in support.
WHO’S DA BOSS!!!
Regardless that we may be exceeding our constitutional authority, in a 259-107 vote, the House mandated the NH Attorney General to join the law suit challenging the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Now the AG has stated that he will challenge this in court as his office is part of the executive branch of state government. But these arguments didn’t carry the day – even if such a venture will be timely and costly to the taxpayer. Historically, the manner to resolve such an issue would be to solicit an Opinion of the Justices (you know that 3rd branch of government), but heck we’re the General Court and its only money we don’t have!
PISTOL PACKIN MAMA’S & PAPA’S:
This has been a strange session where it seems anything dealing with guns has priority – maybe even more important on the radical extremists’ list of priorities than dismantling government! HB 210 was relative to the use of deadly force. Now it doesn’t matter that no one has been jailed for not retreating and the issue has not been a problem, but 270-92 representatives voted to pass it anyway. Another gun bill (HB 330-FN) was relative to carrying a firearm (concealed, loaded, or unloaded) without a license. It seems that having to get a special permit to carry a concealed weapon really is too inconvenient. So in a vote of 244 – 109 the NH House voted for what they call constitutional carry. Yippee KY-yo, Welcome to Dodge!
GO TO JAIL – THROW AWAY THE KEY!
HB 524-FN dealing with persons convicted of violent crimes was passed 264 – 97, which results in critical and crippling changes to a bill passed last year. Regardless that the Attorney General, or a former republican Speaker of the House testified as to how parole is an effective tool in transitioning prisoners back into society and allows for supervision and control vs. just opening the doors and saying “see yah” when someone has completed their sentence. Even costs didn’t impact this crowd as it cost the taxpayers’ $33,000 dollars per year to house one prisoner.
NO TO VACINATIONS – NOT!
In a surprising moment of common sense – the House defeated (294-49) an attempt to prohibit vaccinations in public school (HB 422). Thankfully a house member who is a retired public health professional inoculated us against a swarm of half truths & falsehoods. I know this crowd would like to go back to a “past time” – thankfully returning to the Middle Ages and the Black Death was seen as too drastic.
DON’T BOGART THAT MED JOINT – MY FRIEND:
Another surprise was the overwhelming support (221-96) received relative to passing the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. So far it appears that marijuana and ethanol are the only issues NH can get bi-partisan agreement!
NH DEFENSE FORCE – ON HOLD (FOR NOW):
In a 175 to 137 vote the House tabled a bill establishing a state defense force. This would be a “militia” force in addition, but separate, to the NH National Guard. I guess it could be called into action to invade Canada, in light of their decision several weeks ago to condemn the Quebeckers over salmon fishing licenses. YES – 137 reps actually voted for this - maybe they saw it as a jobs bill.
SORRY CHARLIE!
The House decided to table (Committee recommendation was to pass) a piece of legislation that would have ordered our federal senators to vote against the Law of the Sea Convention – Sorry - no reprieve for Charlie the Tuna
DON’T WANT TO PAY – DON’T WORRY:
Reduce the interest rate on late and delinquent property tax payments and other unpaid taxes. Sounds great – right! If someone doesn’t pay their property tax bill when due - they now won’t have to pay a penalty. Of course each unpaid property tax bill means that the other conscientious taxpayers in the town will now have to dig deeper into their pockets to make up the difference because towns will have cash flow problems which will result in their having to borrow more to operate. But don’t worry – be happy – it sounds good. Why let reality enter into the scheme of things.
Now – I could go on (there really is more) – however it is too painful to continue – so I hope you will understand.
R. Gagnon, Representative
NH House – Sullivan District IV
Sunday, February 27, 2011
NOCIALIST STATE KEEPS MOVING BACKWARDS!
NH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES – WEEK IN REVIEW
March 21 – 25, 2011
The full House met on Wednesday (2/23) and a spectrum of issues was on the docket ranging from Education to the Portsmouth Naval Ship Yard.
Thankfully thoughtful minds prevailed in killing the bill (213/134) to repeal the requirement that all school districts offer public kindergarten. However, it is still a sad day that 134 representatives felt Kindergarten shouldn’t be part of NH’s core educational programming. Here is a sampling of your Nocialist legislature at work…
NO TO DRINKING LOCAL MILK, BUT YES TO PROTECT MEN
Interestingly – the present NH House of Representatives have the fewest number of women members since 1974. So it is only logical that a bunch of white men had no problem exempting the Commission on the Status of Men from going out of business in June. Apparently, allowing it to fade away would have been too hasty – regardless that no one knows what they do.
However moving us closer to a Nocialist state, the majority of the House overturned a committee report to appropriate emergency relief funds for NH Dairy Farmers. Despite a valiant attempt by committee members who pointed out that milk farmers cannot set the price for their milk and are at the mercy of a convoluted pricing system controlled in DC, the majority (239 Nocialists) felt that this takes money via taxes & fees from individuals and businesses and is a bailout. Forget if this might help the local economy and promote buying local. Forget about helping the local small business dairy farmer. NO Bail outs for regular people – NOCIALIST’S RULE!!!
NO TO BUSINESS DEVELOPERS – “WETLANDS = SACRED GROUND FOR FROGS, MOSQUITOES AND ENVIRONMENTALISTS”
The statement “Wetlands are sacred ground for frogs mosquitoes and environmentalists” was stated on the floor of the NH House, by a ranking republican in an attempt to make light and laugh at the Aquatic Resources Compensatory Mitigation (ARM) Program, regardless of the fact that the program offers significant value and advantages to land developers as well as being sensitive to the environment. Despite testimony, by NH DES, that lowering the administrative fee would threaten the viability of the program, the radical extremists in control of the House voted (261/90) to put at risk the viability of a program that has proven advantageous to NH Business. So much for building the economy...
NO THANK YOU – 2O MILLION $
Probably one of the more foolish acts thus far by these radical extremist libertarians was the defeat (246/104) of New Hampshire’s participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Apparently, RGGI was too complicated for these proponents of a Nocialist state to wrap their heads around. Forget that savings to NH communities are in the millions of dollars – forget that RGGI provides solid protective measures and is good risk management – forget about NH losing 20 million dollars annually in funding – and forget about anything resembling the “common good.” The radicals in charge actually quoted from a 1941 study that refutes global climate change. One republican rep was quoted as saying “climate change is hype!”
NO PROPERTY TAX BREAK FOR REGULAR PEOPLE
Rather than assist people to find basic housing at an affordable cost and encourage small business which is the backbone of our economy – the NH House of Representatives said NO (255/91) to a property tax break for NH families. The bill would have provided an exemption of $100,000 from the State Wide Education Property Tax (SWEPT), which would have resulted in a reduction in taxes for small businesses and residents owning property assessed at less than $625,000, and a minor increase for those residents and businesses assessed at more than 625k. The argument being bantered around was that this was “class warfare” – of course the fact that wages for average NH families have not increased, since 1984, didn’t matter nor that costs are being shifted down to the cities and towns.
NO THANK YOU TO FEDERAL DOLLARS
This could have been titled EXTREMIST POLITICAL IDEOLOGY TRUMPS FINANCIAL AID – for this bill which passed (238/111) creates a committee to review every grant-in-aid program, at every level of state government (Municipal, County and State). This Bill will directly affect the ability of a city, town, school district, county and state agency to accept federal dollars. Forget that this would result in an increase in property taxes, or that it would render NH less competitive and less attractive to companies wanting to locate here. The majority view grants as “unconstitutional encroachments” on the sovereignty of NH and that grants amount “to all intents and purposes of bribing the state of New Hampshire.”
NO TO THE PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
Among one of the more confusing acts this week was the vote 241/89 against supporting the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. As everyone in NH knows the shipyard is a vital economic interest to the State, and is always at risk of closure by the feds regardless of the fact that it is one of only four shipyards specializing in submarines. So why would the NH House of Representatives be on record as not supporting the shipyard is shocking and can only be explained as republican partisan ideologues not wanting to support something a democrat had sponsored.
NO INCOME TAX ON SENIOR CITIZENS - NOT YET!
Thankfully, calm heads prevailed and the attempt to impose increased costs on retired public employees was temporarily averted by sending the bill back to committee. The goal was to raise the cost to retirees for their health care – it doesn’t matter if the present system is a benefit earned by retirees for work provided. They almost had to pay more which could be argued is an income tax on retirees, but I’m sure there will be more on this issue as the session unfolds.
NOCIALISM RULES
Overall, this radical legislature is showing their true agenda – working for the common good is out. Extremist political ideology trumps helping people, creating jobs or building the economy. The NOCIALIST State keeps moving backwards.
March 21 – 25, 2011
The full House met on Wednesday (2/23) and a spectrum of issues was on the docket ranging from Education to the Portsmouth Naval Ship Yard.
Thankfully thoughtful minds prevailed in killing the bill (213/134) to repeal the requirement that all school districts offer public kindergarten. However, it is still a sad day that 134 representatives felt Kindergarten shouldn’t be part of NH’s core educational programming. Here is a sampling of your Nocialist legislature at work…
NO TO DRINKING LOCAL MILK, BUT YES TO PROTECT MEN
Interestingly – the present NH House of Representatives have the fewest number of women members since 1974. So it is only logical that a bunch of white men had no problem exempting the Commission on the Status of Men from going out of business in June. Apparently, allowing it to fade away would have been too hasty – regardless that no one knows what they do.
However moving us closer to a Nocialist state, the majority of the House overturned a committee report to appropriate emergency relief funds for NH Dairy Farmers. Despite a valiant attempt by committee members who pointed out that milk farmers cannot set the price for their milk and are at the mercy of a convoluted pricing system controlled in DC, the majority (239 Nocialists) felt that this takes money via taxes & fees from individuals and businesses and is a bailout. Forget if this might help the local economy and promote buying local. Forget about helping the local small business dairy farmer. NO Bail outs for regular people – NOCIALIST’S RULE!!!
NO TO BUSINESS DEVELOPERS – “WETLANDS = SACRED GROUND FOR FROGS, MOSQUITOES AND ENVIRONMENTALISTS”
The statement “Wetlands are sacred ground for frogs mosquitoes and environmentalists” was stated on the floor of the NH House, by a ranking republican in an attempt to make light and laugh at the Aquatic Resources Compensatory Mitigation (ARM) Program, regardless of the fact that the program offers significant value and advantages to land developers as well as being sensitive to the environment. Despite testimony, by NH DES, that lowering the administrative fee would threaten the viability of the program, the radical extremists in control of the House voted (261/90) to put at risk the viability of a program that has proven advantageous to NH Business. So much for building the economy...
NO THANK YOU – 2O MILLION $
Probably one of the more foolish acts thus far by these radical extremist libertarians was the defeat (246/104) of New Hampshire’s participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Apparently, RGGI was too complicated for these proponents of a Nocialist state to wrap their heads around. Forget that savings to NH communities are in the millions of dollars – forget that RGGI provides solid protective measures and is good risk management – forget about NH losing 20 million dollars annually in funding – and forget about anything resembling the “common good.” The radicals in charge actually quoted from a 1941 study that refutes global climate change. One republican rep was quoted as saying “climate change is hype!”
NO PROPERTY TAX BREAK FOR REGULAR PEOPLE
Rather than assist people to find basic housing at an affordable cost and encourage small business which is the backbone of our economy – the NH House of Representatives said NO (255/91) to a property tax break for NH families. The bill would have provided an exemption of $100,000 from the State Wide Education Property Tax (SWEPT), which would have resulted in a reduction in taxes for small businesses and residents owning property assessed at less than $625,000, and a minor increase for those residents and businesses assessed at more than 625k. The argument being bantered around was that this was “class warfare” – of course the fact that wages for average NH families have not increased, since 1984, didn’t matter nor that costs are being shifted down to the cities and towns.
NO THANK YOU TO FEDERAL DOLLARS
This could have been titled EXTREMIST POLITICAL IDEOLOGY TRUMPS FINANCIAL AID – for this bill which passed (238/111) creates a committee to review every grant-in-aid program, at every level of state government (Municipal, County and State). This Bill will directly affect the ability of a city, town, school district, county and state agency to accept federal dollars. Forget that this would result in an increase in property taxes, or that it would render NH less competitive and less attractive to companies wanting to locate here. The majority view grants as “unconstitutional encroachments” on the sovereignty of NH and that grants amount “to all intents and purposes of bribing the state of New Hampshire.”
NO TO THE PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
Among one of the more confusing acts this week was the vote 241/89 against supporting the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. As everyone in NH knows the shipyard is a vital economic interest to the State, and is always at risk of closure by the feds regardless of the fact that it is one of only four shipyards specializing in submarines. So why would the NH House of Representatives be on record as not supporting the shipyard is shocking and can only be explained as republican partisan ideologues not wanting to support something a democrat had sponsored.
NO INCOME TAX ON SENIOR CITIZENS - NOT YET!
Thankfully, calm heads prevailed and the attempt to impose increased costs on retired public employees was temporarily averted by sending the bill back to committee. The goal was to raise the cost to retirees for their health care – it doesn’t matter if the present system is a benefit earned by retirees for work provided. They almost had to pay more which could be argued is an income tax on retirees, but I’m sure there will be more on this issue as the session unfolds.
NOCIALISM RULES
Overall, this radical legislature is showing their true agenda – working for the common good is out. Extremist political ideology trumps helping people, creating jobs or building the economy. The NOCIALIST State keeps moving backwards.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Legislative Week In Review - #1
NH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES – WEEK IN REVIEW
Feb 15 – 17, 2011
The legislative session has certainly been interesting so far. Several new representatives have gone to the podium crying and screaming about guns (they want them), condemning Canada (too foreign), and acting like Henny Penny mumbling something about the tentacles of the monster federal government and so on… Needless to say - it is never a dull moment under the golden dome in Concord...
Since there are fewer journalists reporting less NH news, on fewer pages devoted to the news than ever before, I thought I would provide a weekly sampling of what has been happening. While I certainly do not claim to be a journalist or even objective – I thought sharing my thoughts and opinions might be interesting.
Now if you’ve been reading the papers or watching television – you know that this week specific high profile hearings were held on the repeal of Same Sex Marriage, as well as stacking the Transportation Committee with ringers to ensure that we don’t have passenger rail in Central NH. But here is a sampling of other issues that were voted on – few had to do with generating jobs & growing the economy.
ARREST A COP:
The NH House voted 240 to 120 (HR 125) to make it lawful to exempt firearms, firearm accessories & ammunition manufactured in NH from federal law and regulations. Now what’s interesting is this bill would make a state or federal cop, who enforced a lawful federal regulation, guilty of a misdemeanor or felony. Many said this bill is unconstitutional and in direct conflict with the National Firearms Act – but that didn’t matter to this radical extremist controlled legislature. Oh, and this is the bill where one of the newly elected reps got up at the podium and screamed that the Federal Government is an “evil monster!”
BAN BIG BIRD:Now don’t think they were done – for we should not forget HB 113 which prohibits the University System of NH to use any state appropriations to fund public television. Or, as I like to think of it, the bill that bans Big Bird – which would be funny enough, but one of the reasons given for supporting this bill was it gets even with PBS’s for firing Juan Williams… This bill to de-fund CH 11 passed 263 to 102.
BUST WORKER RIGHTS:Next was (HB 474-FN) the decision to impose “right to work” on public sector workers – which is really anti-worker/anti-union and has so many unanswered questions it should not have seen the light of day. Sadly, this passed 221 to 131.
SALTY WATER – IS GOOD FOR YOU:
Not to be undone – the Resources, Recreation & Development Committee brought to the full session a bill that defeated incentives for salt applicators to be trained and to implement proper salt application practices. Apparently, once salt gets into your water system it is there forever. Well, the majority wanted nothing to do with that kind of “Nanny State” thinking –so inexpedient to legislate was how it went down!
BIG BAD EVIL FEDS:
My favorite crazy bills were HB 440-FN and HCR 6. The first requires NH to join the lawsuit challenging federal health care reform legislation and repealing the authority for state implementation of federal health care reform. Forget, as stressed by the minority, this clearly constitutes an enforcement action challenging federal law. Passing this bill will undermine NH control and put our people at risk. The minority further pointed out that passing this bill will rescind that authority, thus pass the reins over to the federal government to take control of the program. Someone else got up and pointed out a number of benefits NH people are presently receiving which would be jeopardized. Needless to say – Feds are evil and this passed 267 to 92.
SECURE BORDERS – NOT THE NH WAY:
HCR 6 (House Concurrent Resolution) admonishes the federal government for entering into an agreement with Canada and Mexico relative to the Security & Prosperity Partnership after September 11, 2001. It also undermines the authority of New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, as well as encroaches upon the essential functions of the executive branch. This passed 215 to 140.
NOW YOU SEE IT – NOW YOU DON’T (TAX RELIEF THAT IS):
Last but not least – was an exercise in political hype and “smoke & mirrors” which I like to call – Now you see it – Now you don’t! I am referring to HB 37-FN-A and HB 166-FN which gives the illusion of a tax cut on your communications (land line) bill, as well as reduces the meals & rooms tax. Yes – the republican legislature overwhelmingly voted to cut our taxes – only to table both measures immediately after passing which puts them in political limbo and translates into – Sorry, just kidding!
Well – I could go on, but my doctor says I need to pace myself and not get too excited – so stay tuned.
Raymond Gagnon, Representative
NH House of Representatives
Sullivan District IV
Feb 15 – 17, 2011
The legislative session has certainly been interesting so far. Several new representatives have gone to the podium crying and screaming about guns (they want them), condemning Canada (too foreign), and acting like Henny Penny mumbling something about the tentacles of the monster federal government and so on… Needless to say - it is never a dull moment under the golden dome in Concord...
Since there are fewer journalists reporting less NH news, on fewer pages devoted to the news than ever before, I thought I would provide a weekly sampling of what has been happening. While I certainly do not claim to be a journalist or even objective – I thought sharing my thoughts and opinions might be interesting.
Now if you’ve been reading the papers or watching television – you know that this week specific high profile hearings were held on the repeal of Same Sex Marriage, as well as stacking the Transportation Committee with ringers to ensure that we don’t have passenger rail in Central NH. But here is a sampling of other issues that were voted on – few had to do with generating jobs & growing the economy.
ARREST A COP:
The NH House voted 240 to 120 (HR 125) to make it lawful to exempt firearms, firearm accessories & ammunition manufactured in NH from federal law and regulations. Now what’s interesting is this bill would make a state or federal cop, who enforced a lawful federal regulation, guilty of a misdemeanor or felony. Many said this bill is unconstitutional and in direct conflict with the National Firearms Act – but that didn’t matter to this radical extremist controlled legislature. Oh, and this is the bill where one of the newly elected reps got up at the podium and screamed that the Federal Government is an “evil monster!”
BAN BIG BIRD:Now don’t think they were done – for we should not forget HB 113 which prohibits the University System of NH to use any state appropriations to fund public television. Or, as I like to think of it, the bill that bans Big Bird – which would be funny enough, but one of the reasons given for supporting this bill was it gets even with PBS’s for firing Juan Williams… This bill to de-fund CH 11 passed 263 to 102.
BUST WORKER RIGHTS:Next was (HB 474-FN) the decision to impose “right to work” on public sector workers – which is really anti-worker/anti-union and has so many unanswered questions it should not have seen the light of day. Sadly, this passed 221 to 131.
SALTY WATER – IS GOOD FOR YOU:
Not to be undone – the Resources, Recreation & Development Committee brought to the full session a bill that defeated incentives for salt applicators to be trained and to implement proper salt application practices. Apparently, once salt gets into your water system it is there forever. Well, the majority wanted nothing to do with that kind of “Nanny State” thinking –so inexpedient to legislate was how it went down!
BIG BAD EVIL FEDS:
My favorite crazy bills were HB 440-FN and HCR 6. The first requires NH to join the lawsuit challenging federal health care reform legislation and repealing the authority for state implementation of federal health care reform. Forget, as stressed by the minority, this clearly constitutes an enforcement action challenging federal law. Passing this bill will undermine NH control and put our people at risk. The minority further pointed out that passing this bill will rescind that authority, thus pass the reins over to the federal government to take control of the program. Someone else got up and pointed out a number of benefits NH people are presently receiving which would be jeopardized. Needless to say – Feds are evil and this passed 267 to 92.
SECURE BORDERS – NOT THE NH WAY:
HCR 6 (House Concurrent Resolution) admonishes the federal government for entering into an agreement with Canada and Mexico relative to the Security & Prosperity Partnership after September 11, 2001. It also undermines the authority of New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, as well as encroaches upon the essential functions of the executive branch. This passed 215 to 140.
NOW YOU SEE IT – NOW YOU DON’T (TAX RELIEF THAT IS):
Last but not least – was an exercise in political hype and “smoke & mirrors” which I like to call – Now you see it – Now you don’t! I am referring to HB 37-FN-A and HB 166-FN which gives the illusion of a tax cut on your communications (land line) bill, as well as reduces the meals & rooms tax. Yes – the republican legislature overwhelmingly voted to cut our taxes – only to table both measures immediately after passing which puts them in political limbo and translates into – Sorry, just kidding!
Well – I could go on, but my doctor says I need to pace myself and not get too excited – so stay tuned.
Raymond Gagnon, Representative
NH House of Representatives
Sullivan District IV
Friday, February 18, 2011
Speech in Opposition to House Resolution 6
The following is a speech I made on the floor of the NH House of Representatives (2/9/11) regarding a resolution asking the NH House to condemn Canada.
R. Gagnon – Testimony HR-6
Mr. Speaker – I rise today to oppose HR 6 – while I certainly recognize that this came out of committee as unanimously OTP – I cannot concur and consent to this piece of legislation.
Since when does this body not uphold the fundamental right of – DUE PROCESS? Whatever happened to having one’s day in court before being condemned?
Because that’s what this resolution does? Without knowing the full story and all the facts, regardless of the point that this matter is in litigation – we are asked to CONDEMN Canada? Does the majority want to give the message that they hate government so much they are prepared to immediately interfere and meddle in another Nation’s business before the facts are known?
IN talking with my colleagues – some who own property in Canada – there may be certain Canadian policies that appear to be protectionist. So I ask: how should we effectively address & rectify those practices? If we are truly serious - Do you really think this resolution will work and succeed at righting any perceived wrongs?
Might not a better course of action have been to go through existing intra – governmental channels such as our joint NH/QC membership to the Eastern Region Council of State Governments, or the New Eng Governors/Eastern Canadian Premiers Organization that meets yearly and has permanent offices & staff in both countries – or maybe explore if the NH/Canada Trade Council - a statutory committee of this General Court might help at opening dialogue on perceived protectionist matters affecting NH residents?
NO - it would seem that our approach prefers using an AXE rather than a scalpel when operating thru this exercise in diplomatic surgery! WHY are we prepared to throw under the bus and condemn – a country and province that has been a friend and ally for centuries because they have changed their rules to expand the opportunity for their citizens to fish?
This resolution is harsh, and makes it seem that we are talking about some kind of 3rd World dictatorship – not a nation and province that has a legal system on a par with our own and with a history of fair play!
Have we forgotten how after the 9/11 attacks we froze our air space, and it was the Canadians who stepped up and took in all the international flights from Europe and cared for our people on their journey home?
Have we forgotten how for the past 10 years both QC &Canada have worked with us to ensure that another attack does not occur?
Have we forgotten that Canadian troops are fighting and dying with us in Afghanistan? And more close to home – Have we forgotten how Canadian & QC law enforcement yearly work with our State Police to ensure that our motorcycle week is safe and free of international biker gang criminals?
This Resolution suggests – none of those facts matter – someone only has to allege a misdeed & we’ll rush in and condemn – even before Canada has the opportunity to defend itself before the NAFTA Tribunal? By Golly! Is that image we want for NH?
This Resolution implies – Forget if you’ve been our friend, neighbor, and ally & have had a relationship with us since the 1600’s – the mere allegation by one individual merits condemnation! Forget that 30% of this State’s population is descended from individuals who migrated from Canada & Quebec – of course I probably shouldn’t raise the topic of Immigration too loudly – as I suspect there are some of you will next want to question our citizenship and right to be here!
Mr. Speaker – the responsible action would be to retain this bill and allow the Canadians their day before the NAFTA Tribunal. If we are seriously concerned about licensing & permitting policies relative to Salmon fishing, by another government who’s intent was to make the fishing of salmon more equitable and transparent and thus improve the public’ access to the fishing of Salmon in their waters – OR other polices we feel are protectionist - perhaps a preferred course of action would be to enter into serious dialogue with our friends & neighbors to the north rather than to insult, condemn and close doors.
To jump in and impose ourselves on the international stage, on this matter, at this time, is premature. This resolution is Over-Kill.
Thank You.
Raymond Gagnon
R. Gagnon – Testimony HR-6
Mr. Speaker – I rise today to oppose HR 6 – while I certainly recognize that this came out of committee as unanimously OTP – I cannot concur and consent to this piece of legislation.
Since when does this body not uphold the fundamental right of – DUE PROCESS? Whatever happened to having one’s day in court before being condemned?
Because that’s what this resolution does? Without knowing the full story and all the facts, regardless of the point that this matter is in litigation – we are asked to CONDEMN Canada? Does the majority want to give the message that they hate government so much they are prepared to immediately interfere and meddle in another Nation’s business before the facts are known?
IN talking with my colleagues – some who own property in Canada – there may be certain Canadian policies that appear to be protectionist. So I ask: how should we effectively address & rectify those practices? If we are truly serious - Do you really think this resolution will work and succeed at righting any perceived wrongs?
Might not a better course of action have been to go through existing intra – governmental channels such as our joint NH/QC membership to the Eastern Region Council of State Governments, or the New Eng Governors/Eastern Canadian Premiers Organization that meets yearly and has permanent offices & staff in both countries – or maybe explore if the NH/Canada Trade Council - a statutory committee of this General Court might help at opening dialogue on perceived protectionist matters affecting NH residents?
NO - it would seem that our approach prefers using an AXE rather than a scalpel when operating thru this exercise in diplomatic surgery! WHY are we prepared to throw under the bus and condemn – a country and province that has been a friend and ally for centuries because they have changed their rules to expand the opportunity for their citizens to fish?
This resolution is harsh, and makes it seem that we are talking about some kind of 3rd World dictatorship – not a nation and province that has a legal system on a par with our own and with a history of fair play!
Have we forgotten how after the 9/11 attacks we froze our air space, and it was the Canadians who stepped up and took in all the international flights from Europe and cared for our people on their journey home?
Have we forgotten how for the past 10 years both QC &Canada have worked with us to ensure that another attack does not occur?
Have we forgotten that Canadian troops are fighting and dying with us in Afghanistan? And more close to home – Have we forgotten how Canadian & QC law enforcement yearly work with our State Police to ensure that our motorcycle week is safe and free of international biker gang criminals?
This Resolution suggests – none of those facts matter – someone only has to allege a misdeed & we’ll rush in and condemn – even before Canada has the opportunity to defend itself before the NAFTA Tribunal? By Golly! Is that image we want for NH?
This Resolution implies – Forget if you’ve been our friend, neighbor, and ally & have had a relationship with us since the 1600’s – the mere allegation by one individual merits condemnation! Forget that 30% of this State’s population is descended from individuals who migrated from Canada & Quebec – of course I probably shouldn’t raise the topic of Immigration too loudly – as I suspect there are some of you will next want to question our citizenship and right to be here!
Mr. Speaker – the responsible action would be to retain this bill and allow the Canadians their day before the NAFTA Tribunal. If we are seriously concerned about licensing & permitting policies relative to Salmon fishing, by another government who’s intent was to make the fishing of salmon more equitable and transparent and thus improve the public’ access to the fishing of Salmon in their waters – OR other polices we feel are protectionist - perhaps a preferred course of action would be to enter into serious dialogue with our friends & neighbors to the north rather than to insult, condemn and close doors.
To jump in and impose ourselves on the international stage, on this matter, at this time, is premature. This resolution is Over-Kill.
Thank You.
Raymond Gagnon
Friday, December 31, 2010
Time Will Tell...
Time will tell…
It’s the last day of December 2010 and the November elections are now history –hopefully enough time has passed for the dust to settle – heal a few wounds – and provide an opportunity to look back at what happened. President Obama called it a shellacking – others have called it a tsunami – I think of it as a debacle. Certainly former Governor Sununu is to be congratulated for re-building the NH Republican party – his hard work certainly demonstrates what gravitas is & how to use it to move your agenda… Guess those pronouncements that NH being a Blue State was a bit premature!
But what are the lessons learned? A lot of pundits, self-proclaimed experts and morning quarterbacks have killed a lot of trees dissecting and telling us what happened – so I thought I would join the parade.
For starters, the NH GOP & Governor Sununu did an excellent job of marrying the problems & opinions people have of Washington DC with Concord NH. Of all the comments and explanations I have heard – the linking of Washington with Concord is the best I’ve been able to wrap my head around. While I’d like to claim credit for such insight – I first heard it from someone on a panel (of pundits, self-proclaimed experts & morning quarterbacks) at Saint Anslem College’s Institute of Politics. It is the best & most accurate truism to explain the loss of the NH House, Senate, and Executive Council, as well as the loss of one federal senate race and two federal members of congress. A lot of dems I know are still walking around in a daze – wondering what happened. Truth & facts aside – people just believed that NH government was broken and out of control… Yup – a debacle!
Of course the democrats did not help matters and appeared more interested in touting social issues instead of addressing people’s fear about lost jobs and an economy in free fall. Couple this with the opposition staying on message (plus a lot of money) – resulted in the democrats being out played on the Public Street.
Now all of this brings us up to the present - as the NH legislature prepares to convene next week (1/5/11) – what should we expect? The size of the Republican win is so large that the democrats (all 102) in the House could walk out and the republicans still have a quorum. Actually there are almost as many representatives who were endorsed by the Liberty Alliance as there are elected democrats. So, what should we expect? At first glance - such a large majority should bode well for state government and getting things done – right? Time will tell...
My thought is who are these newly elected representatives of the NH General Court? According to available info – most have never held elected office – many appear to have strong radical libertarian leanings – almost all claim to be “true” conservatives – so does that mean they are Free Staters intent on taking over NH, or are they just homegrown libertarians? Interestingly, if they are Free Staters, few have been transparent about belonging to this movement intent on using NH as a social science lab for their radical libertarian ideas – who knows only time will tell…
The question is will this republican coalition stay together, or will it fragment and divide between traditional “main street” republicans – strong individual rights libertarians – and conservative faith-based pols? One indicator of what to expect is the list of proposed legislation that has been filed. In looking over the list - there are bills to repeal gay marriage & civil unions, change education funding, allow tax caps, and bills that will affect a woman’s right to choose. They also have bills that support Arizona’s immigrant legislation – create a NH Militia separate from the National Guard – allow guns in the state house – and the list goes on….
Republican leadership has publically said it wants in the 1st year to focus on the budget – and postpone the social agenda for year two. Speculation is will they be able to keep their members in line. Their concern over the budget is sound – as we have always known it will be more challenging than the one recently past. Most experts have cited New Hampshire as having been better managed and fared better than most states throughout this international recession, so it will be interesting to see how the present regime addresses the problem.
Under the democrats – the plan was to spread out the budget pain equally while not totally dismantling programs and services that affected New Hampshire’s most needy. Now we will see how the republicans address this ongoing crisis. Much of their rhetoric has been for drastic cuts - personally, my concern will be to not shift costs back to the cities and towns. However, if the focus is to cut the present budget and since forty percent (40%)of the state’s budget is aid to municipalities, I am curious on how they’ll cut and not shift costs down to the local level. My fear is that “Local Control” will really mean “handle it yourselves.”
According to my friends in state government, the rumor going around is that agencies will now be more “business friendly” – but what does that mean? Will there be more opportunities for business to expand and create high paying jobs, or is it just a mask to disguise legislation that fosters de-regulation that supports pollution, exploitation and an overall blind eye? We know that anti-labor “Right to Work” legislation has been proposed for this session – so only time will tell….
Now the partisan side of me hopes the Republicans will over-reach and self-destruct, however as a believer in government there is a part of me that wishes them well. Sadly, this past election cycle represents the third in a row that has resulted in drastic political change and membership which means that those elected are more often part of each party’s extreme wings. I suspect if the pollsters are right that the general public want less division and politicians working together – the masses may be very disappointed in both Washington & Concord.
As someone who strongly believes in the center and finding common ground - let’s hope that the NO LABELS movement takes hold and has an impact. Unfortunately, my fear is what we will see are extremists more concerned with promoting a specific political ideology and not into serious dialogue and solid solutions that make matters better. Time will tell…
It’s the last day of December 2010 and the November elections are now history –hopefully enough time has passed for the dust to settle – heal a few wounds – and provide an opportunity to look back at what happened. President Obama called it a shellacking – others have called it a tsunami – I think of it as a debacle. Certainly former Governor Sununu is to be congratulated for re-building the NH Republican party – his hard work certainly demonstrates what gravitas is & how to use it to move your agenda… Guess those pronouncements that NH being a Blue State was a bit premature!
But what are the lessons learned? A lot of pundits, self-proclaimed experts and morning quarterbacks have killed a lot of trees dissecting and telling us what happened – so I thought I would join the parade.
For starters, the NH GOP & Governor Sununu did an excellent job of marrying the problems & opinions people have of Washington DC with Concord NH. Of all the comments and explanations I have heard – the linking of Washington with Concord is the best I’ve been able to wrap my head around. While I’d like to claim credit for such insight – I first heard it from someone on a panel (of pundits, self-proclaimed experts & morning quarterbacks) at Saint Anslem College’s Institute of Politics. It is the best & most accurate truism to explain the loss of the NH House, Senate, and Executive Council, as well as the loss of one federal senate race and two federal members of congress. A lot of dems I know are still walking around in a daze – wondering what happened. Truth & facts aside – people just believed that NH government was broken and out of control… Yup – a debacle!
Of course the democrats did not help matters and appeared more interested in touting social issues instead of addressing people’s fear about lost jobs and an economy in free fall. Couple this with the opposition staying on message (plus a lot of money) – resulted in the democrats being out played on the Public Street.
Now all of this brings us up to the present - as the NH legislature prepares to convene next week (1/5/11) – what should we expect? The size of the Republican win is so large that the democrats (all 102) in the House could walk out and the republicans still have a quorum. Actually there are almost as many representatives who were endorsed by the Liberty Alliance as there are elected democrats. So, what should we expect? At first glance - such a large majority should bode well for state government and getting things done – right? Time will tell...
My thought is who are these newly elected representatives of the NH General Court? According to available info – most have never held elected office – many appear to have strong radical libertarian leanings – almost all claim to be “true” conservatives – so does that mean they are Free Staters intent on taking over NH, or are they just homegrown libertarians? Interestingly, if they are Free Staters, few have been transparent about belonging to this movement intent on using NH as a social science lab for their radical libertarian ideas – who knows only time will tell…
The question is will this republican coalition stay together, or will it fragment and divide between traditional “main street” republicans – strong individual rights libertarians – and conservative faith-based pols? One indicator of what to expect is the list of proposed legislation that has been filed. In looking over the list - there are bills to repeal gay marriage & civil unions, change education funding, allow tax caps, and bills that will affect a woman’s right to choose. They also have bills that support Arizona’s immigrant legislation – create a NH Militia separate from the National Guard – allow guns in the state house – and the list goes on….
Republican leadership has publically said it wants in the 1st year to focus on the budget – and postpone the social agenda for year two. Speculation is will they be able to keep their members in line. Their concern over the budget is sound – as we have always known it will be more challenging than the one recently past. Most experts have cited New Hampshire as having been better managed and fared better than most states throughout this international recession, so it will be interesting to see how the present regime addresses the problem.
Under the democrats – the plan was to spread out the budget pain equally while not totally dismantling programs and services that affected New Hampshire’s most needy. Now we will see how the republicans address this ongoing crisis. Much of their rhetoric has been for drastic cuts - personally, my concern will be to not shift costs back to the cities and towns. However, if the focus is to cut the present budget and since forty percent (40%)of the state’s budget is aid to municipalities, I am curious on how they’ll cut and not shift costs down to the local level. My fear is that “Local Control” will really mean “handle it yourselves.”
According to my friends in state government, the rumor going around is that agencies will now be more “business friendly” – but what does that mean? Will there be more opportunities for business to expand and create high paying jobs, or is it just a mask to disguise legislation that fosters de-regulation that supports pollution, exploitation and an overall blind eye? We know that anti-labor “Right to Work” legislation has been proposed for this session – so only time will tell….
Now the partisan side of me hopes the Republicans will over-reach and self-destruct, however as a believer in government there is a part of me that wishes them well. Sadly, this past election cycle represents the third in a row that has resulted in drastic political change and membership which means that those elected are more often part of each party’s extreme wings. I suspect if the pollsters are right that the general public want less division and politicians working together – the masses may be very disappointed in both Washington & Concord.
As someone who strongly believes in the center and finding common ground - let’s hope that the NO LABELS movement takes hold and has an impact. Unfortunately, my fear is what we will see are extremists more concerned with promoting a specific political ideology and not into serious dialogue and solid solutions that make matters better. Time will tell…
Friday, November 19, 2010
Election 2010
WE were saturated with political ads consisting of half truths and sloganeering throughout this election cycle. The problem is what was fact or fiction! We heard a lot about the NH Budget and while I don’t want to minimize the issue, the budget is balanced and a 70 million dollar surplus does exists. That fact/claim is by professional auditors – not partisan politicians.
In June, the Legislature was called back into a special session. Due to the recession, a revenue shortfall was discovered; therefore, to keep the budget balanced, certain adjustments were needed. Among those adjustments was repeal of the controversial LLC Tax –which was done by both democrats and republicans (including this writer). The adjusted budget reflects across the board cuts – there were no sacred cows. Consensus was that more cuts would have had a negative impact on services for the most needy in the state.
Also about those taxes & fees – fact: in the 2009/2010 session, there were over 35 increases to fees & several new fees – all were sponsored by republicans.
Regarding the management of the state – there are a few facts we need to know. According to the WALL STREET JOURNAL (10/4/2010), New Hampshire is among the 10 best-run states in the Nation. The article reports that well-run states “keep balanced books, investment is prudent and debt is sustainable”. Another interesting fact is that the nation’s 3 largest bond rating agencies have held NH’s rating steady reflecting a "fundamentally strong state economy." Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Services, and Fitch Ratings have all maintained the state’s above average ratings.
Now I know everything is not wonderful – and times are tough requiring due-diligence by all elected officials. However, I hope you will realize that the governor and legislators presently in power have remained focused and frugal.
Lastly, regarding next session’s budget – I don’t have a crystal ball – but I do know that crafting a budget will be a major challenge. It will take hard work and possible sacrifice – not sloganeering. Let's see what the other team will do - stay tuned...
In June, the Legislature was called back into a special session. Due to the recession, a revenue shortfall was discovered; therefore, to keep the budget balanced, certain adjustments were needed. Among those adjustments was repeal of the controversial LLC Tax –which was done by both democrats and republicans (including this writer). The adjusted budget reflects across the board cuts – there were no sacred cows. Consensus was that more cuts would have had a negative impact on services for the most needy in the state.
Also about those taxes & fees – fact: in the 2009/2010 session, there were over 35 increases to fees & several new fees – all were sponsored by republicans.
Regarding the management of the state – there are a few facts we need to know. According to the WALL STREET JOURNAL (10/4/2010), New Hampshire is among the 10 best-run states in the Nation. The article reports that well-run states “keep balanced books, investment is prudent and debt is sustainable”. Another interesting fact is that the nation’s 3 largest bond rating agencies have held NH’s rating steady reflecting a "fundamentally strong state economy." Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Services, and Fitch Ratings have all maintained the state’s above average ratings.
Now I know everything is not wonderful – and times are tough requiring due-diligence by all elected officials. However, I hope you will realize that the governor and legislators presently in power have remained focused and frugal.
Lastly, regarding next session’s budget – I don’t have a crystal ball – but I do know that crafting a budget will be a major challenge. It will take hard work and possible sacrifice – not sloganeering. Let's see what the other team will do - stay tuned...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)